U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1993

Roy James Irby, Jr. v. Kenneth Taylor, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland J. Joseph Curran, Jr.

Roy James Irby, Jr. v. Kenneth Taylor, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland J. Joseph Curran, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 25, 1993
989 F.2d 493; 1993 WL 84560 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Roy James Irby, Jr. v. Kenneth Taylor, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland J. Joseph Curran, Jr.

Opinion

989 F.2d 493

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Roy James IRBY, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Kenneth TAYLOR, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland; J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-6058.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 1, 1993
Decided: March 25, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-92-3145)

Roy James Irby, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Cathleen C. Brockmeyer, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Roy James Irby, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Irby v. Taylor, No. CA-92-3145 (D. Md. Jan. 11, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.