U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1993

Peter Emmanuel Bernard v. Lonnie M. Saunders Edward C. Morris Edward W. Murray Larry D. Huffman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 26, 1993

991 F.2d 787; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 16776; 1993 WL 128536 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

991 F.2d 787

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Peter Emmanuel BERNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lonnie M. SAUNDERS; Edward C. Morris; Edward W. Murray;
Larry D. Huffman, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-7225.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 1, 1993
Decided: April 26, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-92-391)

Peter Emmanuel Bernard, Appellant Pro Se.

William Rundahl Coleman, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Peter Emmanuel Bernard appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bernard v. Saunders, No. CA-92-391 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

We have considered Bernard's supplemental pleadings

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.