James William Thomas v. Edward W. Murray Attorney General of Virginia
James William Thomas v. Edward W. Murray Attorney General of Virginia
Opinion
991 F.2d 791
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James William THOMAS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY; Attorney General of Virginia,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 92-7251.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 29, 1993
Decided: April 22, 1993
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-91-560-R)
James William Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James William Thomas seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Thomas v. Murray, No. CA-91-560-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 25, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.