United States v. Michael Smallen, A/K/A Bolo, A/K/A Eddie
United States v. Michael Smallen, A/K/A Bolo, A/K/A Eddie
Opinion
991 F.2d 792
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Michael SMALLEN, a/k/a Bolo, a/k/a Eddie, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6670.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 4, 1993
Decided: April 19, 1993
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CR-88-126-N, CA-91-347-N)
Michael Smallen, Appellant Pro Se.
Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Lawrence Eugene Spong, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Michael Smallen appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smallen v. United States, Nos. CR-88-126-N, CA-91-347-N (E.D. Va. June 10, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.