U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1993

Kenneth Arthur Smith v. L. L. Waters, Warden Captain J. F. Kalhesh Lieutenant A. Schetrempf Hutchenson, Co Winters, Co McKinsley Co Younher, Co

Kenneth Arthur Smith v. L. L. Waters, Warden Captain J. F. Kalhesh Lieutenant A. Schetrempf Hutchenson, Co Winters, Co McKinsley Co Younher, Co
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 27, 1993
993 F.2d 229; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19153; 1993 WL 130212 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Kenneth Arthur Smith v. L. L. Waters, Warden Captain J. F. Kalhesh Lieutenant A. Schetrempf Hutchenson, Co Winters, Co McKinsley Co Younher, Co

Opinion

993 F.2d 229

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kenneth Arthur SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
L. L. WATERS, Warden; Captain J. F. Kalhesh; Lieutenant A.
Schetrempf; Hutchenson, Co; Winters, Co;
McKinsley, Co; Younher, Co,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6093.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 29, 1993
Decided: April 27, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-92-1003-JFM)

Kenneth Arthur Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Amy Kushner Kline, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Kenneth Arthur Smith appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Waters, No. CA-92-1003-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 14, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Smith's motion for appointment of counsel

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.