Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1993

James E. Clifton v. Commissioner Reyes John D. Simpson

James E. Clifton v. Commissioner Reyes John D. Simpson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 1993
993 F.2d 1536; 1993 WL 181326 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

James E. Clifton v. Commissioner Reyes John D. Simpson

Opinion

993 F.2d 1536

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James E. CLIFTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Commissioner REYES; John D. Simpson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6356.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 3, 1993
Decided: May 28, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-92-1271-AM)

James E. Clifton, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

James E. Clifton filed a civil rights suit pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Plaintiff failed to comply with the fee order. Plaintiff appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑