Guy v. Hayes
Guy v. Hayes
Opinion
993 F.2d 1537
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Samuel Wayne GUY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ransom HAYES; Teresa Locklear, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Roosevelt STRICKLAND; Paul Taylor; R. Hunt, Captain; Nora
Hunt; Don Hunt; J. C. Huggins; Robert Stone; Glenn
Beasley; Jimmy N. Oxendine; Jeffrey Marks; Harry Mitchell;
Ethel Chavis; Betty Powell; Ron Verndrick; J. Sanderson,
Lieutenant; Butch McMillen; Cindy Hester, Defendants.
No. 93-6167.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 3, 1993
Decided: May 26, 1993
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-91-490-CRT-H)
Samuel Wayne Guy, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Wayne Guy appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Guy v. Strickland, No. CA-91-490-CRT-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 3, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.