U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1993

Restoney Robinson v. James C. Fox

Restoney Robinson v. James C. Fox
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 27, 1993
993 F.2d 1538; 1993 WL 177762 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Restoney Robinson v. James C. Fox

Opinion

993 F.2d 1538

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Restoney ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James C. FOX, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-6230.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 3, 1993
Decided: May 27, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (MISC-92-90-5-BR)

Restoney Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Restoney Robinson appeals from the district court's order dismissing his motion to amend the pleadings in a civil rights action which was previously dismissed by the district court and affirmed on appeal by this Court. Once Robinson appealed the original action, the district court no longer had jurisdiction and properly denied Robinson's motion. Consequently, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.