Turner v. Waters
Turner v. Waters
Opinion
993 F.2d 1539
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Joseph Mario TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lloyd L. WATERS, Warden; Mr. Horning, Assistant Warden;
John W. Shifler, Lieutenant; G. T. Reeser, Sergeant; R.
Dovey, Sergeant; M. Whiteside, Officer; Officer Shoemaker;
N. Schetrompf, Officer; Officer Wittington, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6206.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 3, 1993
Decided: May 27, 1993
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-92-1039-JFM)
Joseph Mario Turner, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
DISMISSED.
Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Joseph Mario Turner appeals from the district court order denying his motion to compel discovery. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.s 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.