Robert Crisp v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Robert Crisp v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Opinion
996 F.2d 1210
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert CRISP, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 93-6006.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 7, 1993.
Decided: June 23, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-92-479-2)
Robert Crisp, Appellant Pro Se.
Reneen Evat Hewlett, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Robert Crisp seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.* Crisp v. Murray, No. CA-92-479-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 23, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
We deny Crisp's Motion for Oral Argument
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.