Joe Lee Fulgham v. Norfolk Police Department
Joe Lee Fulgham v. Norfolk Police Department
Opinion
996 F.2d 1210
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Joe Lee FULGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-6463.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 7, 1993.
Decided: June 29, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-330)
Joe Lee Fulgham, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Joe Lee Fulgham appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fulgham v. Norfolk Police Dep't, No. CA-93-330 (E.D. Va. Apr. 16, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.