Joseph Riddick v. White House, United States Government, Washington, D.C.
Joseph Riddick v. White House, United States Government, Washington, D.C.
Opinion
996 F.2d 1212
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Joseph RIDDICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WHITE HOUSE, United States Government, Washington, D.C.,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-6295.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 7, 1993.
Decided: June 24, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-179)
Joseph Riddick, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Joseph Riddick appeals from the district court's order dismissing Riddick's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Riddick v. White House, No. CA-93-179 (W.D. Va. Mar. 5, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.