David M. Simms v. Charles Hall, Magistrate
David M. Simms v. Charles Hall, Magistrate
Opinion
996 F.2d 1212
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David M. SIMMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles HALL, Magistrate, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-6344.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 7, 1993.
Decided: June 24, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge. (CA-92-679-R)
David M. Simms, Appellant Pro Se.
Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
David M. Simms appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).* Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Simms v. Hall, No. CA-92-679-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.