Restoney Robinson v. Peggy Jones
Restoney Robinson v. Peggy Jones
Opinion
996 F.2d 1212
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Restoney ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Peggy JONES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-6234.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 7, 1993.
Decided: June 23, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-532-CRT-F)
Restoney Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Restoney Robinson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Jones, No. CA-91-532-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 1992; Dec. 3, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.