Larry Barbenten Simmons v. Bishop L. Robinson Richard A. Lanham Eugene Nuth Blake McCracken Inez Houston

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit August 5, 1993

Larry Barbenten Simmons v. Bishop L. Robinson Richard A. Lanham Eugene Nuth Blake McCracken Inez Houston, 2 F.3d 1150 (4th Cir. 1993)

1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20926; 1993 WL 307130

Opinion

2 F.3d 1150

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Larry Barbenten SIMMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bishop L. ROBINSON; Richard A. Lanham; Eugene Nuth; Blake
McCracken; Inez Houston, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6511.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 16, 1993.
Decided: August 5, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-93-53-HAR)

Larry Barbenten Simmons, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Larry Barbenten Simmons appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Simmons v. Robinson, No. CA-93-53-HAR (D. Md. Apr. 19, 1993; May 10, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Status: Unpublished