Raymond McBride v. United States Steel Corporation Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
Raymond McBride v. United States Steel Corporation Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
Opinion
7 F.3d 224
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Raymond MCBRIDE, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION; Director, Office of
Workers' Compensation Programs, United States
Department of Labor, Respondents.
No. 93-1172.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 6, 1993.
Decided: September 20, 1993.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (91-1295-BLA, 91-1295-BLA-A)
Raymond McBride, Petitioner Pro Se.
Ronald Eugene Gilbertson, Kilcullen, Wilson & Kilcullen, Washington, D.C.; Marta Kusic, Staff Attorney, Matthew P. Levin, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Raymond McBride seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. # 8E8E # 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1992). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. McBride v. United States Steel Corp., Nos. 91-1295-BLA; 91-1295BLA-A (B.R.B. Dec. 30, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished