U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1993

Billy J. Hess v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Consolidation Coal Company

Billy J. Hess v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Consolidation Coal Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 20, 1993
8 F.3d 818; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34734; 1993 WL 421002 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Billy J. Hess v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Consolidation Coal Company

Opinion

8 F.3d 818

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Billy J. HESS, Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; Consolidation Coal
Company, Respondents.

No. 93-1308.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 6, 1993.
Decided: October 20, 1993.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (91-1191-BLA)

Billy J. Hess, Petitioner Pro Se.

Karen Nancy Blank, Barbara J. Johnson, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.; William Steele Mattingly, Jackson & Kelly, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Respondents.

Ben. Rev. Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Billy J. Hess seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1992). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Hess v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 91-1191BLA (B.R.B. Feb. 23, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.