Lorenzo C. Grandison v. Lenin Harris Eugene Gizzard
Lorenzo C. Grandison v. Lenin Harris Eugene Gizzard
Opinion
8 F.3d 818
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lorenzo C. GRANDISON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lenin HARRIS; Eugene Gizzard, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6745.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 27, 1993.
Decided: October 28, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Lorenzo C. Grandison, Appellant Pro Se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Grandison v. Harris, No. CA-91-840-AM (E.D. Va. July 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished