Robinson v. Faust
Robinson v. Faust
Opinion
8 F.3d 820
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Adrien Lyle ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thomas N. FAUST; David M. Bogard, Director of Corrections;
Captain Pinson, Classification Officer; Sergeant Hogan,
Classification Officer; Corporal McCook, Classification
Officer; Corporal Sims, Classification Officer; Corporal
Gentry, Classification Officer; Corporal Freeze,
Classification Officer; Corporal Criss, Classification
Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6578.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 27, 1993.
Decided: October 26, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Adrien Lyle Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Jack L. Gould, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Faust, No. CA-92-420 (E.D. Va. June 1, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.