U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1993

Harold Elwood Pritchett, Jr. v. D. K. Smith B. Evans J. Streat

Harold Elwood Pritchett, Jr. v. D. K. Smith B. Evans J. Streat
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 18, 1993
10 F.3d 806; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 35869; 1993 WL 476410 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Harold Elwood Pritchett, Jr. v. D. K. Smith B. Evans J. Streat

Opinion

10 F.3d 806

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Harold Elwood PRITCHETT, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
D. K. SMITH; B. Evans; J. Streat, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6920.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 25, 1993.
Decided: November 18, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

Harold Elwood Pritchett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.