Roger L. Setliff, Jr. v. David v. Williams Robert Bushnell Wayne Baucino
Roger L. Setliff, Jr. v. David v. Williams Robert Bushnell Wayne Baucino
Opinion
12 F.3d 205
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Roger L. SETLIFF, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David V. WILLIAMS; Robert Bushnell; Wayne Baucino,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-7045.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 25, 1993.
Decided Nov. 19, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke, No. CA-93-662-R; James C. Turk, District Judge.
Roger L. Setliff, Jr., pro se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Setliff v. Williams, No. CA-93-662-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished