U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1993

Jeffrey Wayne Sullivan v. G. MacKenzie Rast U.S. Parole Commission

Jeffrey Wayne Sullivan v. G. MacKenzie Rast U.S. Parole Commission
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 18, 1993
12 F.3d 206; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36848; 1993 WL 491305 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Jeffrey Wayne Sullivan v. G. MacKenzie Rast U.S. Parole Commission

Opinion

12 F.3d 206

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jeffrey Wayne SULLIVAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
G. MacKenzie RAST; U.S. Parole Commission, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6972.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 25, 1993.
Decided Nov. 18, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh, No. CA-92-710-BO; Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.

Jeffrey Wayne Sullivan, pro se.

Barbara Dickerson Kocher, Office of the U.S. Atty., Raleigh, NC, for defendants-appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sullivan v. Rast, No. CA-92-710-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.