Earl Henry Wright v. Raymond Wright Edward S. Whitlock, Jr. Andrene Coury Charleston County Police Department
Earl Henry Wright v. Raymond Wright Edward S. Whitlock, Jr. Andrene Coury Charleston County Police Department
Opinion
12 F.3d 206
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Earl Henry WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Raymond WRIGHT; Edward S. Whitlock, Jr.; Andrene Coury;
Charleston County Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-7017.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 25, 1993.
Decided Nov. 19, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia, No. CA-92-3127-3-19BC; Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
Earl Henry Wright, pro se.
Nancy B. Tecklenburg, South Carolina Coastal Council, Sandra J. Senn, Stuckey & Kobrovsky, Charleston, SC, for defendants-appellees.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Wright, No. CA-92-3127-3-19BC (D.S.C. Sept. 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.