Jack Quillen v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Lee-Man Mining Company
Jack Quillen v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Lee-Man Mining Company
Opinion
14 F.3d 596
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jack QUILLEN, Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United
States Department of Labor; Lee-Man Mining
Company, Respondents.
No. 92-1785.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 21, 1993.
Dec. 21, 1993.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
Jack Quillen, petitioner pro se.
Patricia May Nece, Rita A. Roppolo, U.S. Dep't of Labor; Monroe Jamison, Jr., Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, for respondents.
Ben. Rev. Bd.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Jack Quillen seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1992). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Quillen v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 90-1432-BLA (June 18, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.