U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1993

Falin v. Shalala

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 30, 1993 · Kaufman, Sprouse, Widener

6 F.3d 207; 1993 WL 382463 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Martin Douglas Wegbreit, Client Centered Legal Services of Southwest Virginia, Inc., Castlewood, VA, argued, for appellant., William Markley Reinhart, Asst. Regional Counsel, Office of the Gen. Counsel, Dept, of Health & Human Services, Philadelphia, PA, argued (Eileen Bradley, Chief Counsel, Region III, Michael Leonard, Supervisory Asst. Regional Counsel, Office of the Gen. Counsel, Dept, of Health & Human Services, Philadelphia, PA, Debra J. Prillaman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Richmond, VA, on brief), for Federal appellee., Pamela M. Reed, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, argued (Mary Sue Terry, Atty. Gen. of Va., on brief), for State appellee.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision. The 3 that cite it most often are listed here.

Hazard v. Shalala (6th Cir. 1995)
Hazard v. Shalala (6th Cir. 1995)
Falin v. Shalala (4th Cir. 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

We have considered. the record in this case, the briefs of the parties and oral argument and are of opinion that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed.

Accordingly, we affirm on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court. Falin v. Sullivan, 776 F.Supp. 1097 (E.D.Va. 1991).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.