U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1993

Hundley v. Skaff

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 18, 1993 · Hamilton, Phillips, Widener

9 F.3d 1106; 1993 WL 475377 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Daniel Foster Hedges, Charleston, WV, argued for plaintiffs-appellants., Thomas R. Michael, Michael & Kupec, Clarksburg, WV, on brief, for plaintiff-appellant Eaton., Jan L. Fox, Deputy Atty. Gen., Charleston, WV, argued (Mario J. Palumbo, Atty. Gen., on brief), for defendants-appellees.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Jackson v. Elswick (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2022)
Anthony v. Powell (District Court, D. Maryland 2021)
Hundley v. Skaff (4th Cir. 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Having considered the record in this case and the briefs, and after oral argument, we are of opinion the decision of the district court should be affirmed.

Accordingly, we affirm on the opinion of the district court, Beasley v. Duncil, et al. (three cases), 792 F.Supp. 485 (S.D.W.Va. 1992).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.