Solomon Chatman-Bey v. Lt. McCracken
Solomon Chatman-Bey v. Lt. McCracken
Opinion
14 F.3d 593
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Solomon CHATMAN-BEY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Lt. McCRACKEN, Defendant Appellee.
No. 93-7085.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 4, 1994.
Decided Jan. 18, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-93-1769-S)
Solomon Chatman-Bey, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chatman-Bey v. McCracken, No. CA-93-1769-S (D. Md. Sept. 24, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.