U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Ramarro L. Smith v. Rae A. Reighard, Case Worker, Maryland Correctional Institute

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 20, 1994

14 F.3d 596; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5009; 1994 WL 12046 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

14 F.3d 596
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ramarro L. SMITH, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Rae A. REIGHARD, Case Worker, Maryland Correctional
Institute, Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-7144.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 1993.
Decided Jan. 20, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M.J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-93-1432-MJG)

Ramarro L. Smith, appellant pro se.

Audrey J. S. Carrion, Office of the Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Reighard, No. CA-93-1432-MJG (D. Md. Oct. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.