Williams v. Department of Navy
Williams v. Department of Navy
Opinion
14 F.3d 599
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James S. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY; David Earthum; Jimmie Dikes;
Charlie Kane; E.J. Lowery, Captain; H. Lawrence
Garrett, III, Secretary of the Navy,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-1407.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 16, 1993.
Decided Jan. 5, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston, Nos. CA-92-272-18AJ, CA-92-273-18AJ; David C. Norton, District Judge.
James S. Williams, appellant pro se.
Joseph Preston Strom, Jr., U.S. Atty., Columbia, SC, for appellees.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendants' motions for summary judgment in his employment discrimination actions. Our review of the records and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Department of Navy, Nos. CA-92-272-18AJ, CA-92-273-18AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.