Copeland v. Lomen
Copeland v. Lomen
Opinion
16 F.3d 409
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Terry Wendell COPELAND, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lieutenant LOMEN; Captain Tuthill; Lieutenant Troy;
Sergeant Perkins; Purnell, Chief of Security; Reichlyn
Reicly, Captain; Sewall B. Smith; Singletary, Chief of
Security; Captain Wouldridge, Jr.; Mrs. Wouldridge,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6885.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Jan. 6, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-93-885-S).
Terry Wendell Copeland, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Copeland v. Lomen, No. CA-93-885-S (D. Md. Aug. 17, 1993).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We deny Copeland's motion for injunctive relief in this Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.