Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. John H. Connell T. Woods Francis E. Dail James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor of North Carolina David W. Daniel
Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. John H. Connell T. Woods Francis E. Dail James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor of North Carolina David W. Daniel
Opinion
16 F.3d 411
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
John H. CONNELL; T. Woods; Francis E. Dail; James B.
Hunt, Jr., Governor of North Carolina; David W.
Daniel, Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-6946.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 20, 1994.
Decided Feb. 7, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge.
Cornelius Tucker, Jr., appellant Pro Se.
Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Asst. Atty. Gen., James Peeler Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, NC, for appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Connell, No. CA-93-467-CRT-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.