Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

In the Matter of Baby "K" (Three Cases)

In the Matter of Baby "K" (Three Cases)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 10, 1994 · Wilkins, Williams, Sprouse
16 F.3d 590 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

ARGUED: Julia Krebs-Markrich, John E. Coffey, Hazel & Thomas, P.C., Falls Church, Virginia; Pleasant S. Brodnax, III, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellants. Ellen Joanne Flannery, Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Jennifer L.W. Korjus, Hazel & Thomas, P.C., Falls Church, Virginia; Kenneth E. Labowitz, Young, Goldman & Van Beek, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellants. Debra Ann Palmer, Richard W. Buchanan, Theodore M. Hirsch, Georgia Kazakis, Cov-ington & Burling, Washington, D.C., for Ap-pellee. Alison Paige Landry, ReNee D. Brooks, Department for Rights of Virginians with Disabilities, Richmond, Virginia, for Amicus Curiae Department for Rights of Virginians with Disabilities; Walter A. Smith, Jr., Stephan E. Lawton, Anne M. Dellinger, Laura E. Loeb, Hogan & Hartson, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae American Academy of Pediatrics and Society of Critical Care Medicine.

In the Matter of Baby "K" (Three Cases)

Cases that cite this one

55 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Dissenting Opinion

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.