U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

John O. Broadway v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

John O. Broadway v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 24, 1994
19 F.3d 10; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11419; 1994 WL 65323 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

John O. Broadway v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Opinion

19 F.3d 10

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John O. BROADWAY, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney
General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents Appellees.

No. 93-7097.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 20, 1994.
Decided: Feb. 24, 1994.

Appeal from the United Sttes District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr. District Judge. (CA-92-2345).

John O. Broadway, appellant pro se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Broadway v. State of South Carolina, No. CA-92-2345 (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.