Bruce Anderson v. David B. Beach
Bruce Anderson v. David B. Beach
Opinion
19 F.3d 10
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Bruce ANDERSON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
David B. BEACH, Defendant Appellee.
No. 93-7069.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 8, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-93-701-R).
Bruce E. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Anderson v. Beach, No. CA-93-701-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 20, 1993). We deny Appellant's motion for discovery and production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.