U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Irvin L. Ward, Sr. v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company, and Virginia Employment Commission

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 7, 1994

19 F.3d 13; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11526; 1994 WL 70879 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

19 F.3d 13

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Irvin L. WARD, Sr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant Appellee,
and
Virginia Employment Commission, Defendant.

No. 93-2091.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 7, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-92-409-R).

Irvin L. Ward, Sr., appellant pro se.

Donald Bell Haller, Bell Atlantic, Washington, D.C.; William Paul Wallace, Jr., Johnson, Ayers & Matthews, Roanoke, VA, for appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ward v. Chesapeake & Potomac, No. CA-92-409-R (W.D. Va. July 23, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appellant's motion to amend the docketing statement is granted

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.