William Cook Holloway v. F. Mohadjerini Lynette Mundey William Meadows
William Cook Holloway v. F. Mohadjerini Lynette Mundey William Meadows
Opinion
19 F.3d 1429
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Cook HOLLOWAY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
F. MOHADJERINI; Lynette Mundey; William Meadows,
Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-7204.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 20, 1994.
Decided: February 25, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-93-1611-S)
William Cook Holloway, Appellant Pro Se.
Joseph Barry Chazen, Shipley, Curry & Taub, P.A., Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Holloway v. Mohadjerini, No. CA-93-1611-S (D. Md. Oct. 4, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We deny Appellant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.