Charles E. Davis v. Patricia Huffman Clarence L. Jackson
Charles E. Davis v. Patricia Huffman Clarence L. Jackson
Opinion
21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles E. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Patricia HUFFMAN; Clarence L. Jackson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-7130.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 29, 1994.
Decided April 15, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-498-R)
Charles E. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Alan Katz, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Huffman, No. CA-93-498-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 20, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.