Morton v. Smith
Morton v. Smith
Opinion
21 F.3d 423
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jesse MORTON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
William F. SMITH, Warden; Correctional Medical Services and
Sub-Contractor, Individual and Official Capacity;
Health Care Provider for Maryland House
of Correction, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6099.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 6, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-2323-N)
Jesse Morton, appellant pro se.
Richard M. Kastendieck, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Geoffrey Hawthorne Genth, Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Morton v. Smith, No. CA-92-2324-N (D. Md. Jan. 10, 1994 & Oct. 19, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.