U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Melvin Jerome Anderson v. Marvin Sparrow

Melvin Jerome Anderson v. Marvin Sparrow
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 10, 1994
23 F.3d 399; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18438; 1994 WL 175543 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Melvin Jerome Anderson v. Marvin Sparrow

Opinion

23 F.3d 399
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Melvin Jerome ANDERSON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Marvin SPARROW, Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-7190.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 21, 1994
Decided: May 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-93-267-CRT-H)

Melvin Jerome Anderson, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Anderson v. Sparrow, No. CA-93-267-CRT-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.