U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Ricco S. Jenkins v. Patty Leigh Huffman D.H. Peterson J.W. Mustard

Ricco S. Jenkins v. Patty Leigh Huffman D.H. Peterson J.W. Mustard
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 25, 1994
23 F.3d 401; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18486; 1994 WL 144262 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Ricco S. Jenkins v. Patty Leigh Huffman D.H. Peterson J.W. Mustard

Opinion

23 F.3d 401
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ricco S. JENKINS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Patty Leigh HUFFMAN; D.H. Peterson; J.W. Mustard,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6055.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 12, 1994.
Decided April 25, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-93-25-R)

Ricco S. Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Karen Lynn Lebo, Office of the Atty. Gen. of Virginia, Richmond VA, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jenkins v. Huffman, No. CA-93-25-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.