U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

United States v. Charles Willie Kennedy, A/K/A China

United States v. Charles Willie Kennedy, A/K/A China
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 5, 1994
23 F.3d 404; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18599; 1994 WL 170708 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Charles Willie Kennedy, A/K/A China

Opinion

23 F.3d 404
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Charles Willie KENNEDY, a/k/a China, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-7035.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 5, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CR-85-507-H, CA-93-1836-H)

Charles Willie Kennedy, appellant pro se.

Jefferson McClure Gray, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Kennedy, Nos. CR-85-507-H; CA-93-1836-H (D. Md. Aug. 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Kennedy's motion to compel service

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.