U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Clifford A. Jackson v. Thomas Corcoran, Warden, Individual Fitzhugh Herring Kenneth A. Pitts James Moore Ronald D. Leverette Freda Woods

Clifford A. Jackson v. Thomas Corcoran, Warden, Individual Fitzhugh Herring Kenneth A. Pitts James Moore Ronald D. Leverette Freda Woods
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 24, 1994
25 F.3d 1039; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20915; 1994 WL 202530 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Clifford A. Jackson v. Thomas Corcoran, Warden, Individual Fitzhugh Herring Kenneth A. Pitts James Moore Ronald D. Leverette Freda Woods

Opinion

25 F.3d 1039
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Clifford A. JACKSON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Thomas CORCORAN, Warden, Individual; Fitzhugh Herring;
Kenneth A. Pitts; James Moore; Ronald D.
Leverette; Freda Woods, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6292.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 21, 1994.
Decided: May 24, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-93-2646-MJG)

Clifford A. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

Audrey J. S. Carrion, Office of The Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for an injunction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jackson v. Corcoran, No. CA-93-2646-MJG (D. Md. Feb. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.