U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Leonard Epps v. Stuart Simms, State's Attorney for Baltimore City Joseph H.H. Kaplan, Circuit Court Judge

Leonard Epps v. Stuart Simms, State's Attorney for Baltimore City Joseph H.H. Kaplan, Circuit Court Judge
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 19, 1994
25 F.3d 1039; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20907; 1994 WL 201001 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Leonard Epps v. Stuart Simms, State's Attorney for Baltimore City Joseph H.H. Kaplan, Circuit Court Judge

Opinion

25 F.3d 1039
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Leonard EPPS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Stuart SIMMS, State's Attorney for Baltimore City; Joseph
H.H. Kaplan, Circuit Court Judge, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6114.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 21, 1994.
Decided: May 19, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-93-4130-S)

Leonard Epps, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order that denied his Petition for Writ of Mandamus which he filed under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1651 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Epps v. Simms, No. CA-93-4130-S (D. Md. Jan. 10, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.