Charles A. Dread v. Maryland State Police
Charles A. Dread v. Maryland State Police
Opinion
25 F.3d 1039
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles A. DREAD, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND STATE POLICE, Defendant Appellee.
No. 93-2044.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 25, 1994.
Decided May 19, 1994.
Charles A. Dread, appellant pro se.
Betty Stemley Sconion, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pikesville, MD, for appellee.
Before HALL, PHILLIPS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6).* The time periods established by Fed. R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
The district court's statement that the notice of appeal was timely filed was incorrect. The notice was two days late
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.