United States v. David Fuller
United States v. David Fuller
Opinion
25 F.3d 1041
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
David FULLER, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6131.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 19, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-92-13-A, CA-93-1565-AM)
David Fuller, appellant pro se.
Mark Joseph Hulkower, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Fuller, Nos. CR-92-13-A; CA-93-1565-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Fuller raises additional facts in his informal brief; he can submit these facts to the district court for consideration in a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.