James Bennett v. Lieutenant Baldwin K. M. Mottern, Officer
James Bennett v. Lieutenant Baldwin K. M. Mottern, Officer
Opinion
28 F.3d 1208
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James BENNETT, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT BALDWIN; K. M. Mottern, Officer, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6296.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 24, 1994
Decided: June 21, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-85-CT-5-F)
James Bennett, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens* complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bennett v. Baldwin, No. CA-94-85-CT-5-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.