U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Roger Trenton Davis v. Alvin Hudson, Sheriff Roanoke City Jail United States Marshals Service

Roger Trenton Davis v. Alvin Hudson, Sheriff Roanoke City Jail United States Marshals Service
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 8, 1994
28 F.3d 1209; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24736; 1994 WL 326010 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Roger Trenton Davis v. Alvin Hudson, Sheriff Roanoke City Jail United States Marshals Service

Opinion

28 F.3d 1209

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Roger Trenton DAVIS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Alvin HUDSON, Sheriff; Roanoke City Jail; United States
Marshals Service, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6367.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided July 8, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-93-77-R, CA-93-189-R)

Roger Trenton Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

William Fain Rutherford, Jr., Elizabeth Kay Dillon, Kevin Scott Blair, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZELGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia; Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.VA.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Hudson, Nos. CA-93-77-R; CA-93-189-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.