U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Jerry Lee Franklin v. P. Douglas Taylor, Warden T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Jerry Lee Franklin v. P. Douglas Taylor, Warden T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 21, 1994
28 F.3d 1209; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24729; 1994 WL 276905 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Jerry Lee Franklin v. P. Douglas Taylor, Warden T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Opinion

28 F.3d 1209

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jerry Lee FRANKLIN, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
P. Douglas TAYLOR, Warden; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney
General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents Appellees.

No. 94-6334.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided June 21, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-3514-3-0AK)

Jerry Lee Franklin, appellant pro se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Franklin v. Taylor, No. CA-92-3514-3-0AK (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.