U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Ernest McNeil v. North Carolina Department of Corrections

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 21, 1994

28 F.3d 1210; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24699; 1994 WL 276911 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

28 F.3d 1210

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ernest McNEIL, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-6341.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided June 21, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-93-667-5-H)

Ernest McNeil, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McNeil v. North Carolina Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-93-677-5-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.