U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Quinten L. Jackson v. Davis R. Ruark Sampson G. Vincent Patrick Tilghman R. Hunter Nelms Christopher Welch

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 14, 1994

30 F.3d 129; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26670; 1994 WL 363402 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

30 F.3d 129

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Quinten L. JACKSON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Davis R. RUARK; Sampson G. Vincent; Patrick Tilghman; R.
Hunter Nelms; Christopher Welch, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7355.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 23, 1994.
Decided: July 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-92-3572-WN)

Quinten L. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Marlene Trestman, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Daniel Karp, Allen, Johnson, Alexander & Karp, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jackson v. Ruark, No. CA-92-3572-WN (D. Md. Dec. 8, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.